tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6434476798161215380.post8677505115312707333..comments2023-10-18T06:57:31.041-07:00Comments on Topps Baseball Cards: 1991 Topps ReviewUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6434476798161215380.post-18868967484538500492011-04-19T17:45:24.988-07:002011-04-19T17:45:24.988-07:00When I was a child I was big into collecting baseb...When I was a child I was big into collecting baseball cards. Most of them I still have to this day. Unfortunately the majority of them come from the 87-92 era of jack shit. I remember the 91 Topps factory set ran for 18-20 bucks when it was new. So if you consider: $20 new in 1991 dollars vs 10 dollars in 2010, and adjust for inflation that's quite a bit of depreciation. They are fun to look at though.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18405904548375409278noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6434476798161215380.post-71001028429698650202009-03-29T12:54:00.000-07:002009-03-29T12:54:00.000-07:00In a world where cards were appreciated for their ...In a world where cards were appreciated for their creativity this would be a highly valued set. But since the collecting world is ruled by commodity value ...<BR/><BR/>While I can't stand the consumer aspect of collecting, this set is a reminder of how collectors like us can benefit. A great set like this is terrifically undervalued. I'll take it for $10, thank you very much.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15338430736807023350noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6434476798161215380.post-7924370430620044242009-03-05T11:01:00.000-08:002009-03-05T11:01:00.000-08:00I've always liked 91 Topps. It was a breath of fr...I've always liked 91 Topps. It was a breath of fresh air after 1990. I think Topps realized that 1990 was a mistake and went back to a more traditional look, and I'm glad they did.<BR/><BR/>1992 Topps was a nice evolutionary step from 1991 and both sets look great. 92 had the advantage of being printed on much better card stock though.<BR/><BR/>And I'll join you in hoping that Topps never gets away from the complete stats on the back, at least on the base release.Benhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03728779862706637119noreply@blogger.com